Robison v. Schulze

326 S.W.3d 542, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1646, 2010 WL 4751664
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 2010·No. ED 94428·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Heather M. Robison appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying her relief on Count I of her breach of contract petition against Ron Schulze, Schulze Property Management, LLC, and Gene and Lois Schulze. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Heritage Roofing, LLC v. Fischer, 164 S.W.3d 128, 132 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robison v. Schulze, 326 S.W.3d 542, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1646, 2010 WL 4751664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

326 S.W.3d 542 (Robison v. Schulze) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webb v. Treasurer of Missouri
326 S.W.3d 542 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)