Robison v. Robison ex rel. Lad Associates

622 So. 2d 593, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8361, 1993 WL 302305
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 1993·No. No. 92-02815·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The husband, Ronald W. Robison, appeals from an adverse final judgment entered in favor of the wife, Elizabeth A. Robison, and LAD Associates. We affirm since the record contains competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination that the transfers made to the husband constituted fraudulent transfers. See Teichner & Mella, P.A. v. Butler, 600 So.2d 507 (Fla. 3d DCA1992); Randy Int’l, Ltd. v. American Excess Corp., 501 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA1987); § 726.-106(2), Fla.Stat. (1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robison v. Robison ex rel. Lad Associates, 622 So. 2d 593, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8361, 1993 WL 302305 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 593 (Robison v. Robison ex rel. Lad Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kassier v. Kipnis
677 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)