Robison v. New Peerless Laundry Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Robison v. New Peerless Laundry Co.

179 So. 2d 202

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 1965

DocketNo. 34409

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 So. 2d 202 (Robison v. New Peerless Laundry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robison v. New Peerless Laundry Co., 179 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 2, 196S.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

The petitioner’s application for attorney’s fees is denied.

TPIOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI