Robison v. McAlister

216 Cal. 783
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 25, 1932
DocketL. A. No. 13608
StatusPublished

This text of 216 Cal. 783 (Robison v. McAlister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robison v. McAlister, 216 Cal. 783 (Cal. 1932).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for personal injuries. The facts attending a collision between the motor-bus of the defendant corporation and a Ford car driven by Raymond P. McAlister, a minor, and the questions of law presented are the same as those involved in the case of Eva M. St. Clair v. Raymond P. McAlister et al., (L. A. No. 13607) ante, p. 95 [13 Pac. (2d) 924], this day decided, except as to the name of the plaintiff, who was a passenger on the same bus at the time of the collision, the extent of the injuries, and the amount of the judgment. On the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Clair v. McAlister
13 P.2d 924 (California Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 Cal. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robison-v-mcalister-cal-1932.