Robinson's Executors v. Kenon's Executors

Superior Court of North Carolina

Robinson's Executors v. Kenon's Executors

3 N.C. 181

DecidedJuly 5, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 181 (Robinson's Executors v. Kenon's Executors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson's Executors v. Kenon's Executors, 3 N.C. 181 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

J0HNSTQN., Judge.

This is an action by one surety against ** another to recover a proportion of the snotties paid for the prt-o.pal. There is no case to support such sn action. That *182 such action is not supportable was lately decided at Hillsborough* The plaintiff must resort to equity for a contribution or reimbursement.

^uere de hoc, et vide 2 Bos. & P. 368 to 274.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J0HNSTQN., Judge.

This is an action by one surety against ** another to recover a proportion of the snotties paid for the prt-o.pal. There is no case to support such sn action. That *182 such action is not supportable was lately decided at Hillsborough* The plaintiff must resort to equity for a contribution or reimbursement.

^uere de hoc, et vide 2 Bos. & P. 368 to 274.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinsons-executors-v-kenons-executors-ncsuperct-1802.