Robinson's Executors v. Kenon's Executors

Superior Court of North Carolina

Robinson's Executors v. Kenon's Executors

3 N.C. 181

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1802·Published

Opinion

J0HNSTQN., Judge.

This is an action by one surety against ** another to recover a proportion of the snotties paid for the prt-o.pal. There is no case to support such sn action. That *182 such action is not supportable was lately decided at Hillsborough* The plaintiff must resort to equity for a contribution or reimbursement.

^uere de hoc, et vide 2 Bos. & P. 368 to 274.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J0HNSTQN., Judge.

This is an action by one surety against ** another to recover a proportion of the snotties paid for the prt-o.pal. There is no case to support such sn action. That *182 such action is not supportable was lately decided at Hillsborough* The plaintiff must resort to equity for a contribution or reimbursement.

^uere de hoc, et vide 2 Bos. & P. 368 to 274.

Robinson's Executors v. Kenon's Executors, 3 N.C. 181 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

3 N.C. 181 (Robinson's Executors v. Kenon's Executors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.