Robinson v. Zak
This text of 238 A.D. 808 (Robinson v. Zak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for payment to the appellant Slawski of moneys on deposit with the Long Island State Bank and Trust Company reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted. The fund in question constitutes a special deposit to the credit of this litigation. No part of it belongs to the estate of Johanna Remling. Our affirmance (235 App. Div. 856) of the judgment rendered by the referee, and determining the amount to be recovered in the action brought by the appellant Slawski against Johanna Remling’s executors, was for a sum exceeding the amount of the special deposit. The deposit had been originally in the hands of the county treasurer, subject to the outcome of this litigation; and its withdrawal from that depository to the defendant bank was for the sole purpose of obtaining a greater sum as interest than was obtainable by a continuance of the deposit with the county treasurer. As no part of this fund was the property of Johanna Remling, and the appellant having succeeded in his action, the fund, therefore, belongs to the appellant and is awarded to him. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Cars-well, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 A.D. 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-zak-nyappdiv-1933.