Robinson v. Works & Lentz Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma·Decided October 12, 2021·No. 5:21-cv-00390·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DEMARCO ROBINSON, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. CIV-21-390-G WORKS & LENTZ, INC., Defendant. ORDER Now before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7) filed on May 19, 2021. The Motion seeks dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 1). On June 2, 2021, Plaintiff timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint supersedes the Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis vy. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (0th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2021.

(Barba B. Kadai United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Works & Lentz Inc, (W.D. Okla. 2021).

Robinson v. Works & Lentz Inc (Robinson v. Works & Lentz Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

William H. Davis v. Txo Production Corp.
929 F.2d 1515 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)