Robinson v. Woodside-Astoria Transportation Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Woodside-Astoria Transportation Co.

241 A.D. 686

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The court’s interpretation of the verdict was correct. (McMahon v. Hetch-Hetchy, etc., Ry. Co., 2 Cal. App. 400; Pelton v. Goldberg, 81 Conn. 280; Callahan v. Rayburn, 110 Miss. 107; Houston v. Ladies’ Union Branch Association, 87 Ga. 203; Morrissey v. Schindler, 18 Neb. 672; Atkinson v. Lawrence, 161 Ky. 166; Jeansch v. Lewis, 1 S. D. 609; Wilson v. Means, 25 Kan. 83; Crockett & Sons v. Anselin, [Tex.] 132 S. W. 99.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The court’s interpretation of the verdict was correct. (McMahon v. Hetch-Hetchy, etc., Ry. Co., 2 Cal. App. 400; Pelton v. Goldberg, 81 Conn. 280; Callahan v. Rayburn, 110 Miss. 107; Houston v. Ladies’ Union Branch Association, 87 Ga. 203; Morrissey v. Schindler, 18 Neb. 672; Atkinson v. Lawrence, 161 Ky. 166; Jeansch v. Lewis, 1 S. D. 609; Wilson v. Means, 25 Kan. 83; Crockett & Sons v. Anselin, [Tex.] 132 S. W. 99.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.

Robinson v. Woodside-Astoria Transportation Co., 241 A.D. 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 686 (Robinson v. Woodside-Astoria Transportation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related