Robinson v. Woodmansee

76 Ga. 830
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 23, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 76 Ga. 830 (Robinson v. Woodmansee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Woodmansee, 76 Ga. 830 (Ga. 1886).

Opinion

Hall, Justice.

[Woodmansee et al. filed their petition for an attachment against W. G. Robinson, Jr., and R. Y. Robinson, alleging, in brief, as follows: Under a bill filed by the petitioners, a receiver was appointed to take charge of the effects of W. G. Robinson and the business lately conducted by him, and injunction was issued, restraining the defendants from interfering with the assets in the receiver’s hands or from collecting any amounts on claims growing out of the business. This injunction was violated, and the defendants had proceeded to collect claims growing out of the business, but failed to pay them over to the receiver on demand. Attachment nisi was issued and served on W. G. Robinson ; R. V. Robinson being absent from the state, was not served.

[831]*831The respondent who was served answered, in brief, as follows: Before the filing of the bill, the respondent sold his business to his brother, and gave him authority to sign checks, drafts, etc. After the bill was filed, negotiations for a settlement were pending and apparently near consummation. Some checks, drafts, etc., came in during that time. Under advice of counsel, he turned over such as came into his hands to R. Y. Robinson, to be held subject to be delivered to a receiver if one should be appointed. Respondent remembers endorsing only one of these drafts. R. Y. Robinson generally received the mail and retained such checks, etc. Respondent has been fined $100 for making the endorsement stated. He states that some of the items alleged to have been collected were collected before the receiver was appointed; others have not been collected at all, and others this respondent has no knowledge about.

On the hearing, upon the petition, answer and certain affidavits, the court ordered the respondent to be imprisoned for twenty days, to be discharged upon payment of $82 to the receiver. The respondent excepted.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keys v. . Alligood
100 S.E. 113 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
Murphey v. Harker
41 S.E. 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Charters v. Candler
21 S.E. 518 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Ryan v. Kingsbery
14 S.E. 596 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Ga. 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-woodmansee-ga-1886.