Robinson v. Wellman
This text of Robinson v. Wellman (Robinson v. Wellman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6667
CARL LEE ROBINSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
R. WELLMAN; FRANK O’NEAL; MARVIN POLK; EDDIE MCKOY; B. CORRELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03102)
Submitted: July 18, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Lee Robinson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Carl Lee Robinson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and
denying his motion for preliminary injunction, motion to amend his
complaint and requests for discovery as moot. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Robinson v. Wellman,
No. 5:06-ct-03102 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robinson v. Wellman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-wellman-ca4-2007.