Robinson v. Transcontinental Credit and Collection Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Transcontinental Credit and Collection Corp.

220 A.D.2d 569, 633 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10333

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 220 A.D.2d 569 (Robinson v. Transcontinental Credit and Collection Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Transcontinental Credit and Collection Corp., 220 A.D.2d 569, 633 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.H.O.), dated March 21, 1994, which, after a nonjury trial finding it 60% liable for the plaintiffs claim, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $12,007.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Upon our review of the evidence presented at the trial, we find that the Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff is entitled to payment for 60% of the value of the services that she rendered to the defendant (see generally, Northern Westchester Professional Park Assocs. v Town of Bed-ford, 60 NY2d 492, 499; Clancy v County of Nassau, 142 AD2d 626, 627). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.H.O.), dated March 21, 1994, which, after a nonjury trial finding it 60% liable for the plaintiffs claim, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $12,007.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Upon our review of the evidence presented at the trial, we find that the Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff is entitled to payment for 60% of the value of the services that she rendered to the defendant (see generally, Northern Westchester Professional Park Assocs. v Town of Bed-ford, 60 NY2d 492, 499; Clancy v County of Nassau, 142 AD2d 626, 627). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 A.D.2d 569, 633 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-transcontinental-credit-and-collection-corp-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack