Robinson v. Tolbert

920 So. 2d 346, 2006 WL 141731
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 20, 2006
Docket40,488-CA
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 920 So. 2d 346 (Robinson v. Tolbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Tolbert, 920 So. 2d 346, 2006 WL 141731 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

920 So.2d 346 (2006)

James ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
Billy H. TOLBERT, et al., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 40,488-CA.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

January 20, 2006.

*347 Sheva Meshawn Sims, Shreveport, for Appellant, James Robinson.

Tracy L. Oakley, for Appellee, Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana.

Law Offices of Harold G. Toscano, by Steven Curtis Mitchell, for Appellees, Billy H. Tolbert, Gregory Tolbert, Renea Tolbert and Encompass Insurance Company.

Before WILLIAMS, DREW and LOLLEY, JJ.

DREW, J.

Plaintiff, James Robinson, appeals the judgment in this personal injury case arising out of a motor vehicle accident. Robinson argues that the general damages award of $5,000 is inadequate, and that the trial court erred in denying his claim for penalties and attorney fees from his auto insurance company. We affirm.

FACTS

On May 2, 2002, James Robinson was driving his Dodge pickup truck on Louisiana Highway 1 in Caddo Parish when he stopped his truck to wait for the vehicle in front of him to turn left. Subsequently, a vehicle driven by Gregory Tolbert rear-ended Robinson's truck.

Robinson was transported by ambulance to North Caddo Medical Center in Vivian, *348 Louisiana, and then to Schumpert Hospital in Shreveport. Robinson complained of a headache and pain in his neck, low back, and all along the left side of his body. A C-spine x-ray showed evidence of a prior surgery for injuries from an auto accident, but did not reveal any acute injury or fractures. An L-spine x-ray was negative. The emergency room physician felt that Robinson had more of a strain to his muscles and back, left side, without finding anything specific.

On October 8, 2002, Robinson filed suit against Tolbert; Tolbert's parents; their liability insurer, Encompass Insurance Company; and Robinson's own UM insurer, Safeway Insurance Company. The trial court granted Robinson's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and the parties proceeded to a bench trial on the issue of damages.

The trial court found that Robinson sustained relatively minor injuries and damage in the accident, sustained no long-term aggravation to his preexisting medical condition, and sustained no damage in the accident that survived his discharge from physical therapy on July 10, 2002. Robinson was awarded $5,000 in general damages. The claim for penalties and attorney fees against Safeway was denied. Tolbert's parents had been dismissed as defendants at the close of evidence.

Robinson has appealed the judgment, arguing that the general damages award was inadequate to compensate him for the aggravation of his preexisting injury. Robinson further contends that the trial court erred in not awarding penalties and attorney fees for Safeway Insurance's refusal to timely pay his claim.

DISCUSSION

General Damages Award

The trier of fact has much discretion when assessing damages in cases of offenses, quasi offenses, and quasi contracts. La. C.C. art. 2324.1. Before an appellate court may disturb an award for general damages, the record must clearly reveal that the trial court abused its broad discretion in making the award, based on the facts and circumstances peculiar to the case and the individual under consideration. Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114, 114 S.Ct. 1059, 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).

It is only after an articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion that resort to prior awards in similar cases is proper; if an award is abusively low, it is raised to the lowest amount the trier of fact could reasonably have awarded. Dixon v. Tillman, 29,483 (La.App. 2d Cir.5/7/97), 694 So.2d 585, writ denied, 97-1430 (La.9/19/97), 701 So.2d 174. The proper procedure for determining whether an award is excessive is to determine whether the amount can be supported under the interpretation of the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff which reasonably could have been made by the trier of fact; likewise, to determine if an award is inadequate, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant. Manuel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Co., 30,765 (La.App. 2d Cir.8/19/98), 717 So.2d 277.

A defendant in a personal injury case takes his victim as he finds him and is responsible for all natural and probable consequences of his tortious conduct. When the tortfeasor's conduct aggravates a preexisting condition, the tortfeasor must compensate the victim for the full extent of the aggravation. Lenard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 39,580 (La.App. 2d Cir.4/20/05), 900 So.2d 322, citing Foreman *349 v. Babin, 04-423 (La.App. 5th Cir.10/12/04), 887 So.2d 143.

Robinson contends in his first assignment of error that the trial court awarded only $5,000 in general damages despite evidence establishing the aggravation of Robinson's preexisting injury. Accordingly, our discussion begins with an examination of Robinson's medical history prior to the May 2002 accident. Most of these preexisting injuries were apparently caused by Robinson's involvement in a motor vehicle accident on September 19, 1998.

Robinson presented at the Schumpert Emergency Room on February 13, 1999, with complaints of severe constant left shoulder and neck pain. An x-ray of the cervical spine showed narrowing at the C5-6 and C6-7 levels with hypertrophic change present. The emergency room physician's diagnosis was cervical spine disease as the most likely cause of his pain. Robinson was examined by Dr. David Cavanaugh three days later, and Robinson complained to Dr. Cavanaugh about sharp pain in his neck with cramping that radiated into his left arm and hand, causing tingling and numbness. Shortly thereafter, Robinson was referred to a chiropractor, Michael Taylor, who treated Robinson for approximately five months.

Robinson was examined by Dr. Baer Rambach, an orthopaedic surgeon, on March 25, 1999. Robinson stated that he was suffering from pain, soreness, and stiffness in his neck and lower back, and weakness in his left upper extremity. Dr. Rambach's impression was that Robinson had sustained significant soft tissue injuries to the cervical and lumbosacral regions of his spine. Dr. Rambach believed that there were myoligamentous and myofascial sprains to the cervical and lumbar areas in the lumbosacral areas of the spine, although he thought the lumbosacral spine area was improving. Five days later, Robinson was examined by Dr. Edward Dean, a partner of Dr. Rambach, for a second opinion for a workers' compensation insurer. Dr. Dean's impression was acute cervical sprain with probable lumbar strain.

Dr. Rambach ordered an MRI of Robinson's cervical spine that was performed on March 31, 1999. The MRI showed severe degenerative disc disease extending from C3-4 through C6-7 that consisted of four consecutive mixed ventral disc protrusions. When Robinson next met with Dr. Rambach on April 26, 1999, Robinson stated that he had pain in his left shoulder and neck. Robinson complained about neck pain, left shoulder and arm discomfort, weakness in his left arm, and dorsal spine pain mostly on the left side when he was treated by Dr. Rambach on May 13, 1999. Dr. Rambach treated Robinson for the last time on June 28, 1999. Dr. Rambach, who noted that he did not think Robinson's lower back problems were of the magnitude of his cervical problems, referred Robinson to one of his partners, Dr. James Zum Brunnen.

Dr. Zum Brunnen first examined Robinson on July 20, 1999.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartzberg v. Guillory
213 So. 3d 1266 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
Jones v. Progressive Security Insurance Co.
209 So. 3d 912 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
Edwards v. LCR-M CORP., INC.
936 So. 2d 233 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)
Hayes v. State Farm Insurance Co.
928 So. 2d 742 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 So. 2d 346, 2006 WL 141731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-tolbert-lactapp-2006.