Robinson v. Thomas
This text of Robinson v. Thomas (Robinson v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION PHYLLIS ROBINSON and SYLVESTER ROBINSON PLAINTIFFS
No. 4:20-cv-463-DPM TRAVIS THOMAS and AMERICAN NATIONAL COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANTS
ORDER 1. Motion to bifurcate, Doc. 24, granted. The Robinsons’ claims against American National will be tried separately and after their claims against Thomas are tried. Brinker v. Forrest City School District No. 7,344 Ark. 171, 176, 40 S.W.3d 265, 269 (2001). We can do all of this, if necessary, the week of 14 February 2022. 2. The Court would appreciate a supplemental stipulation about the dismissal of Mr. Robinson’s claims. Are all of his claims dismissed by agreement? 3. Thomas and American National must advise the Court by 20 August 2021 whether they join the Robinsons in requesting a settlement conference.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge // Augarsy □□ |
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robinson v. Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-thomas-ared-2021.