Robinson v. TCP Global Corporation

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: June 11, 2024
• Docket: 2:24-cv-00853
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Lavell C. Robinson, Case No. 2:24-cv-00853-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 TCP Global Corporation, 9 Defendant. 10 11 Before the Court are the parties’ status reports. (ECF Nos. 12, 15). In their reports, both 12 parties agree that they will not conduct the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference and 13 file a discovery plan and scheduling order as required by Local Rule 26-1 until the Court rules on 14 their pending motions. The parties are essentially seeking a stay of discovery. But if the parties 15 wish to stay discovery, they must file a motion to stay discovery and demonstrate that they have 16 met the good cause standard as outlined in Gibson v. MGM International, No. 2:23-cv-00140- 17 MMD-DJA, 2023 WL 4455726 (D. Nev. July 11, 2023). The parties must thus either file a 18 stipulation (or motion if they cannot agree) to stay discovery or a discovery plan and scheduling 19 order on or before July 11, 2024. 20 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties shall have until July 11, 2024 to meet 22 and confer and submit either a stipulated discovery plan, a stipulation to stay discovery, or a 23 motion to stay discovery. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this 24 order. 25 DATED: June 11, 2024 26 DANIEL J. ALBREGTS 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE