Robinson v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 8, 2008·No. 08-6542·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6542

MAURICE ROBINSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KIMBERLY S. TAYLOR, Superior Court Judge; MICHELLE WALKER, Assistant District Attorney; KAREN S. BIERNACKI, Assistant District Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00080-WO-RAE)

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Maurice Robinson appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Taylor,

No. 1:08-cv-00080-WO-RAE (M.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Taylor, (4th Cir. 2008).

Robinson v. Taylor (Robinson v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related