ROBINSON v. TATUM

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 2020
Docket3:20-cv-00017
StatusUnknown

This text of ROBINSON v. TATUM (ROBINSON v. TATUM) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ROBINSON v. TATUM, (S.D. Ga. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STAT ES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

DUBLIN DIVISION

QUANTOVIA ROBINSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 320-017 ) COII TATUM; FNU MIMBS; FNU ) JACKSON; and LIEUTENANT MORING, ) ) Defendants. ) _________

O R D E R _________ Plaintiff, incarcerated at Telfair State Prison in Helena, Georgia, has submitted to the Court for filing a complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, regarding events alleged to have occurred at Dodge State Prison in Chester, Georgia. I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. no. 2.) After reviewing Plaintiff’s application, it appears that he lacks sufficient resources to prepay the filing fee. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, subject to compliance with the conditions of this Order. Plaintiff is hereby advised that under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, all prisoners, even those who are allowed to proceed in forma pauperis, must pay the filing fee of $350.00 in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff must also pay the full appellate court filing fee if a Notice of Appeal is filed. Prisoner litigants allowed to proceed in forma pauperis must pay an initial partial filing fee of twenty percent (20%) of the greater of the average monthly deposits to, or the average monthly balance in, the prisoner’s account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Prison officials are then required to collect the balance of the filing fee by deducting twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). This payment shall be forwarded to the Clerk of Court “each time the amount in the plaintiff’s account exceeds $10 until the full filing fees are paid.” Id. The entire filing fee must be paid even if this suit is dismissed at the outset

because it is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks monetary damages against a defendant who is immune from such relief. In addition to requiring payment of the full filing fee, the Act requires prisoners to exhaust all administrative remedies prior to filing a federal lawsuit which challenges “prison conditions.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e; see also 18 U.S.C. § 3626(g)(2). All prisoner civil rights actions are subject to dismissal if the prisoner has not exhausted the available administrative remedies with respect to each claim asserted. Moreover, even if the complaint is dismissed

for failure to exhaust, the prisoner will still be responsible for payment of the full filing fee. The law also provides that a prisoner cannot bring a new civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action in forma pauperis if the prisoner has on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated, brought a civil action or appeal in federal court that was dismissed because it was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The only exception to this “three strikes” rule is if the prisoner is in

“imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Because of these requirements in the law, the Court will give Plaintiff an opportunity, at this time, to voluntarily dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Such a voluntary dismissal will not require Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or count as a dismissal which may later subject him to the three-dismissal rule under section 1915(g). Plaintiff may dismiss his case at this time by filing a notice of dismissal. However, should Plaintiff choose to proceed with his case, he MUST comply with the following instructions: (1) Plaintiff must furnish the enclosed Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement to the trust (financial) officer of each prison where he has been confined for the past six

months. The trust officer will complete and sign the form and return the form and supporting documents to Plaintiff for submission to the Court. Two copies of the form are enclosed for this purpose.1 (2) Plaintiff must sign and date the enclosed Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account. By signing this form, Plaintiff gives his consent to the collection of the entire filing fee from his prison account in installments, in accordance with the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

(3) Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within thirty days of this Order. Once Plaintiff has returned the required forms, the Court will review Plaintiff’s complaint, to be amended as described below, to determine which, if any, claims are viable and which, if any, Defendants should be served with a copy of the complaint.

1The Court is aware Plaintiff has submitted some financial information in conjunction with his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (See doc. no. 2, p. 4.) However, Plaintiff must follow the instructions set forth in this Order regarding the enclosed Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement so that the trust officer can provide the Court with the current information needed to determine the amount of any appropriate initial filing fee. Plaintiff is cautioned that while this action is pending, he shall immediately inform this Court of any change of address. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case, without prejudice. II. Plaintiff Must Submit an Amended Complaint on the Standard Form Used by Incarcerated Litigants

Plaintiff commenced this case by submitting a complaint to the Clerk of Court in the Middle District of Georgia. (Doc. no. 1.) United States District Judge Marc T. Treadwell transferred the case to the Southern District of Georgia because the events about which Plaintiff complains occurred in the Dublin Division of this District. (Doc. no. 5.) Because Plaintiff did not submit his claims on the standard complaint form used by incarcerated litigants in the Southern District of Georgia, he has not provided the information that the Southern District requires. Therefore, if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, he MUST, within thirty days of the date of this Order, file a complete amended complaint on the standard complaint form used by incarcerated litigants in the Southern District of Georgia, and include all matters he wishes the Court to consider in that one document. The Court DIRECTS the CLERK to attach a standard form complaint used by incarcerated litigants in the Southern District of Georgia, stamped with this case number, to

Plaintiff’s service copy of this Order. The Statement of Claim must not exceed six handwritten pages attached to the standard form. See Goodison v. Washington Mut. Bank, 232 F. App’x 922, 923 (11th Cir. 2007) (affirming the dismissal of a case where the plaintiff failed to heed the pleading instructions from the court regarding re-drafting the complaint); see also London v. Georgia Dep’t of Corr., CV 502-107, doc. no. 10 (M.D. Ga. May 10, 2002) (directing that amended complaint shall not exceed six handwritten pages).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aisha Goodison v. Washington Mutual Bank
232 F. App'x 922 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.
483 F.3d 1184 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
James Edward Hoefling, Jr. v. City of Miami
811 F.3d 1271 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ROBINSON v. TATUM, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-tatum-gasd-2020.