Robinson v. Tainter

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Robinson v. Tainter

16 Miss. 613

Court of Appeals of Mississippi·Decided January 15, 1847·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Clayton

delivered the opinion of the court.

The single question in this cause is, whether the forfeiture of a forthcoming bond, and the judgment consequent thereon, is an extinguishment of the lien of the original judgment.

Giving to the former decisions' of this court their full and [618] legitimate effect, there can be no doubt upon that point. Such judgment on the bond, merges the former judgment, with all its incidents. So the court below decided, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Clayton

delivered the opinion of the court.

The single question in this cause is, whether the forfeiture of a forthcoming bond, and the judgment consequent thereon, is an extinguishment of the lien of the original judgment.

Giving to the former decisions' of this court their full and [618] legitimate effect, there can be no doubt upon that point. Such judgment on the bond, merges the former judgment, with all its incidents. So the court below decided, and the judgment is affirmed.

Robinson v. Tainter, 16 Miss. 613 (Mich. Ct. App. 1847).

Pincite

16 Miss. 613 (Robinson v. Tainter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.