Robinson v. Stevens' Adm'r.

63 Vt. 555
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedMay 15, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 Vt. 555 (Robinson v. Stevens' Adm'r.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Stevens' Adm'r., 63 Vt. 555 (Vt. 1891).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

TAFT, J.

The petitioner asked the County Court to have a cause in favor of Stevens, the petitionee’s intestate,against Butters, brought forward on the docket, the judgment stricken off and the cause re-heard, alleging that through the fraud of Stevens, damages were entered for too large a sum. The petitioner is neither a real nor nominal party to the record. He is not shown to be a subsequent attaching creditor, and as such entitled to defend under R. L. s. 1166. For aught that appears he is nothing but a mere trespasser, and to open a judgment upon the application of a volunteer, when the parties to it make no complaint, would be to treat the solemn adjudication of the court too lightly. We are unable to see any right in the petitioner to appear in the suit, when it was pending, and without such right it would be folly to open the judgment. The petition was properly dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate Blum
185 Misc. 43 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1945)
State ex rel. McConihe v. Steiner
109 P. 57 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Vt. 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-stevens-admr-vt-1891.