Robinson v. State

149 S.W. 190, 67 Tex. Crim. 170, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 406
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 12, 1912·No. No. 1889.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This was a conviction for robbery, the indictment being the same in this ease as in the case of Collin Robinson v. State, No. 1888, this day decided. I am of the opinion that the motion to quash was well taken under the recent decision of Green v. State, in an opinion by Judge Prendergast. My brethren hold in that I am mistaken in the case of Robinson v. State, No. 1888. Following that case and in deference to the majority opinion the judgment herein is ordered to be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 149 S.W. 190, 67 Tex. Crim. 170, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 406 (Tex. 1912).

149 S.W. 190 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coker v. State
160 S.W. 366 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)