Robinson v. State

114 S.W. 144, 55 Tex. Crim. 124, 1908 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 493
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 Tex. Crim. 550
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 25, 1908·No. No. 4012.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charged Tom Robinson, Jim Lasserre and one Alvido, whose Christian name was to the grand jury unknown, with keeping a disorderly house. After *125 conviction at the proper time notice of appeal was given and the parties entered into a joint recognizance, as follows: “This day came into open court, Tom Robinson, Jim Lesserre and one ‘Alvido/ the defendants in the above entitled cause, who, together with A. J. Prater, and W. A. Langliam, their sureties, acknowledged themselves severally indebted to the State of Texas, in the penal sum of seven hundred dollars, conditioned etc." * * * Motion to dismiss the appeal is filed by the assistant attorney-general on the ground, that as the recognizance is joint, it is invalid and that this character of recognizance is not sufficiently in compliance with the law to attach the jurisdiction of this court. "Under the authorities this position is well taken and the appeal will have to be dismissed. Goldman v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 436; McMeans v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 130; Lee v. State, 57 S. W. Rep., 97.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 114 S.W. 144, 55 Tex. Crim. 124, 1908 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 493 (Tex. 1908).

114 S.W. 144 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMeans v. State
38 S.W. 998 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Abbott v. State
57 S.W. 97 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1900)
W. Goldman & Co. v. State
34 S.W. 122 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1896)