Robinson v. State

1929 OK CR 517, 282 P. 694, 45 Okla. Crim. 232, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 508
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 44 Okla. Crim. 189
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 23, 1929·No. No. A-6925.·Published

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error, C. D. Robinson, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Bryan county on a charge of embezzling the public funds of said county while acting in the capacity of deputy county treasurer, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $1. and to serve a term of one year’s imprisonment in the state penitentiarj.

The judgment was rendered on the 6th day of September, 1927, and the appeal was lodged in this court- on the 5th day of March, 1928. The record discloses that notice of appeal was served, on the court cleric only. It shows no service of notice on the prosecuting attorney, as required by section 2809, C. O. S. 1921. It does not show the issuance of any summons in error, nor the waiver of such by the Attorney General.

This court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal. Burgess v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 574, 197 Pac. 173; Lutke v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 18, 255 Pac. 719.

For the reasons assigned, the attempted appeal is dismissed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 1929 OK CR 517, 282 P. 694, 45 Okla. Crim. 232, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 508 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

1929 OK CR 517 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lutke v. State
1927 OK CR 136 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1927)
Burgess v. State
1921 OK CR 62 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1921)