Robinson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Robinson v. State

1923 OK CR 362, 221 P. 1118, 25 Okla. Crim. 427, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 98

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 26, 1923

DocketNo. A-4906.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 362 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. State, 1923 OK CR 362, 221 P. 1118, 25 Okla. Crim. 427, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 98 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Olin Robinson, was convicted in the county court of Hughes county on a charge of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor from a certain point in Hughes county to the corner of Main street ¿nd Bullet street in Holdenville. In accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50 and costs. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court *428 on November 5, 1923, petition in error with case-made. Counsel of record for plaintiff in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, which shows that plaintiff in error is at this time serving the sentence. The motion is sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Olin Robinson, was convicted in the county court of Hughes county on a charge of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor from a certain point in Hughes county to the corner of Main street ¿nd Bullet street in Holdenville. In accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50 and costs. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court *428 on November 5, 1923, petition in error with case-made. Counsel of record for plaintiff in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, which shows that plaintiff in error is at this time serving the sentence. The motion is sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 362, 221 P. 1118, 25 Okla. Crim. 427, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.