Robinson v. State of Nebraska

District Court, D. Nebraska·Decided August 14, 2023·No. 8:23-cv-00276·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

KIRK ROBINSON,

Plaintiff, 8:23CV276

vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STATE OF NEBRASKA,

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). Filing No. 2. The Court has received a certified copy of Plaintiff’s trust account information. Filing No. 8. On August 11, 2023, Plaintiff paid the full filing fee in the amount of $402.00. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s IFP Motion will be granted, in part, in that he is not required to pay the $52.00 in administrative fees. Prisoner plaintiffs are required to pay the full amount of the Court’s $350.00 filing fee by making monthly payments to the Court, even if the prisoner is proceeding IFP. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) “makes prisoners responsible for their filing fees the moment the prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal.” In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529–30 (8th Cir. 1997); Jackson v. N.P. Dodge Realty Co., 173 F. Supp. 2d 951 (D. Neb. 2001). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of 20 percent of the greater of Plaintiff’s average monthly account balance or average monthly deposits for the six months preceding the filing of the Complaint. During the past six months, Plaintiff’s average monthly balance was $40,029.65 and his average monthly deposits were $4,870.38. See Filing No. 8. Therefore, pursuant to the formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), the initial partial filing fee would be $8,005.93, based on an average monthly account balance of $40,029.65, which is more than the $350 filing fee for this matter. However, “[i]n no event shall the filing fee collected exceed the amount of fees permitted by statute for the commencement of a civil action . . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(3). Accordingly, Plaintiff would be required to pay a $350.00 filing fee at the

outset of the case, as mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Ashley v. Dilworth, 147 F.3d 715, 716 (8th Cir. 1998) (“The purpose of the Prison Litigation Reform Act was to require all prisoner-litigants to pay filing fees in full, with the only issue being whether the inmate pays the entire filing fee at the initiation of the proceeding or in installments over a period of time.”). Plaintiff has satisfied this requirement with his $402.00 payment. The Court’s filing fee of $402.00 for §1983 actions includes the $350.00 filing fee set out by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and the additional $52.00 administrative fee required when filing all civil actions. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914, Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, No. 14 (“Administrative fee for filing a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court, $52.”).

Prisoners granted IFP status are not required to pay the $52.00 administrative fee under the PLRA. Thus, the $52.00 in administrative fees is an overpayment in this case. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP, Filing No. 2, is granted. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to determine whether Plaintiff’s overpayment should be applied to any of Plaintiff’s previous pro se cases that have an outstanding balance. If none of Plaintiff’s previous pro se cases have an outstanding balance, the Clerk of Court is directed to process a refund to Plaintiff in due course. 3. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in Plaintiff’s case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff’s claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).. The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2023.

BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State of Nebraska, (D. Neb. 2023).

Robinson v. State of Nebraska (Robinson v. State of Nebraska) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Melvin Leroy Tyler
110 F.3d 528 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Jackson v. N.P. Dodge Realty Co.
173 F. Supp. 2d 951 (D. Nebraska, 2001)