Robinson v. State

766 S.W.2d 475, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 327, 1989 WL 21718
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 396
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 1989·No. No. 55453·Published

Opinion

[476]*476ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant was found guilty of burglary in the second degree and stealing. He was sentenced to two concurrent sentences of 15 years for each charge. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Robinson, 684 S.W.2d 529 (Mo.App.1984). Movant then filed a Rule 27.26 motion1 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. After an evidentiary hearing, his motion was denied.

We have reviewed the record and find that the judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 766 S.W.2d 475, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 327, 1989 WL 21718 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

766 S.W.2d 475 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Robinson
684 S.W.2d 529 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)