Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Robinson v. State

279 S.E.2d 304, 158 Ga. App. 54, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2068

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 18, 1981

Docket61606

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 279 S.E.2d 304 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. State, 279 S.E.2d 304, 158 Ga. App. 54, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2068 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

The appellants, Antonio Robinson and L. C. Gibson, were convicted of armed robbery. On appeal, their sole contention is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. Held:

The evidence presented by the state was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the appellants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See generally Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). The conflict between the appellants’ version of what happened and that of the state’s witnesses was for the jury to resolve. See Jones v. State, 147 Ga. App. 296 (248 SE2d 557) (1978); Bradham v. State, 148 Ga. App. 89 (1) (250 SE2d 801) (1978).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI