Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Robinson v. State

191 S.E.2d 116, 126 Ga. App. 478, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1186

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 14, 1972

Docket47282

StatusPublished

This text of 191 S.E.2d 116 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. State, 191 S.E.2d 116, 126 Ga. App. 478, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1186 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for burglary. He contends the court erred both by charging on alibi when he had not set it up as a defense and by giving an incomplete charge on the subject.

Defendant made a statement in which he said he was at home in bed at the time the crime was perpetrated. This is, by implication, a plea of alibi which authorized the court to give an appropriate instruction. Taylor v. State, 155 Ga. 785 (118 SE2d 675).

Submitted June 6, 1972— Decided June 14, 1972. Casey Thigpen, for appellant. H. R. Thompson, District Attorney, for appellee.

The court’s entire charge on alibi reads as follows: "[T]he defendant has denied his guilt of either or both of these offenses, and I charge you that alibi as a defense involved a denial of guilt and the impossibility of the accused’s presence at the scene of the offense at the time of its commission. Evidence as to alibi should be considered by the jury in connection with all other evidence in the case.” This charge is more favorable to the defendant than that which the Georgia Supreme Court has approved. See Thornton v. State, 226 Ga. 837 (178 SE2d 193). But see also Parham v. State, 120 Ga. App. 723 (171 SE2d 911) and Smith v. Smith, 454 F2d 572.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for burglary. He contends the court erred both by charging on alibi when he had not set it up as a defense and by giving an incomplete charge on the subject.

Defendant made a statement in which he said he was at home in bed at the time the crime was perpetrated. This is, by implication, a plea of alibi which authorized the court to give an appropriate instruction. Taylor v. State, 155 Ga. 785 (118 SE2d 675).

Submitted June 6, 1972— Decided June 14, 1972. Casey Thigpen, for appellant. H. R. Thompson, District Attorney, for appellee.

The court’s entire charge on alibi reads as follows: "[T]he defendant has denied his guilt of either or both of these offenses, and I charge you that alibi as a defense involved a denial of guilt and the impossibility of the accused’s presence at the scene of the offense at the time of its commission. Evidence as to alibi should be considered by the jury in connection with all other evidence in the case.” This charge is more favorable to the defendant than that which the Georgia Supreme Court has approved. See Thornton v. State, 226 Ga. 837 (178 SE2d 193). But see also Parham v. State, 120 Ga. App. 723 (171 SE2d 911) and Smith v. Smith, 454 F2d 572.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 S.E.2d 116, 126 Ga. App. 478, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-gactapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack