Robinson v. State
This text of 117 S.E. 769 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquors. The evidence tending to connect him with possession or control of the whisky, which was found outside of his store and outside of his boarding house, run in connection with his store, was wholly circumstantial, and, because of the use by the public and his boarders of the closet where the whisky was found, was insufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s'guilt. It was therefore error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial, See, in this connection, Kennedy v. State, 23 Ga. App. 141 (97 S. E. 894).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 S.E. 769, 30 Ga. App. 280, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-gactapp-1923.