Robinson v. State
This text of 78 S.E. 53 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The primary purpose of the act approved August 21, 1911 (Acts 1911, p. 137), is the preservation of game and fish; but, as incidental to this purpose, it is by section 7 of the act made a misdemeanor to “hunt or fish upon the lands of another, with or without a license, without first having obtained permission from such landowner.” Consent of the landowner is in all cases an essential condition precedent to the right to hunt or fish on his lands. Blassingame v. State, 11 Ga. App. 809 (76 S. E. 392).
2. One who fishes upon the lands of another without his consent is guilty of a misdemeanor, without reference to the character of the water from which the fish are taken. Hence, one who enters upon the land of another without his consent, and while thereon takes fish from a nav[684]*684igable stream upon which the land abuts, is guilty of a violation of the act of 1911.
3. It is not decided whether the Ochlochnee river is a navigable stream in Thomas county, within the meaning of section 3631 of the Civil Code.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 S.E. 53, 12 Ga. App. 683, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-gactapp-1913.