Robinson v. State

262 So. 3d 826
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 2019·No. No. 4D18-1657·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal with respect to his judgment of conviction and sentence. Due to a malfunctioning of the memory device that held the files from Appellant's jury trial, no stenography notes or audio files of the trial exist. The court below attempted to reconstruct the trial record, but was unable to do so. Thus, Appellant was unable to receive a transcript of his jury trial. The State concedes, and we agree, that Appellant is entitled to a full transcript containing appealable issues. See Hardy v. United States , 375 U.S. 277, 279, 84 S.Ct. 424, 11 L.Ed.2d 331 (1964) ; Ader v. State , 814 So.2d 461, 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) ; Smith v. State , 801 So.2d 198, 199-200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Accordingly, we reverse Appellant's conviction and sentence and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

May, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 262 So. 3d 826 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

262 So. 3d 826 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RODNEY CAMPBELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
YOHANIZ CEBALLOS PALOMINO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
270 So. 3d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)