Robinson v. State
48 So. 3d 1031, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18664, 2010 WL 4962864
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 976 So. 2d 1229 →
Opinion
Both appellant and the state agree that the circuit court committed fundamental error when, after a non-jury trial, it entered judgments of conviction for both organized fraud and grand theft. We reverse and remand to the circuit court to vacate the conviction for grand theft and resentence appellant for organized fraud. See Pizzo v. State, 945 So.2d 1203 (Fla.2006); Newton v. State, 31 So.3d 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Pineda v. State, 3 So.3d 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 48 So. 3d 1031, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18664, 2010 WL 4962864 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
48 So. 3d 1031 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newton v. State
31 So. 3d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Pineda v. State
3 So. 3d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Pizzo v. State
945 So. 2d 1203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)