Robinson v. State

792 So. 2d 632, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11926, 2001 WL 946201
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 2001·No. No. 4D01-1040·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for attachment of portions of the record that conclusively refute appellant’s claims of involuntary plea, or for an evidentiary hearing thereon. The record before the trial court when denying the Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, reflected ambiguity in connection with what was represented to be appellant’s maximum sentence.

This ambiguity arose from the use of an outdated plea form which did not detail sentencing under the Criminal Punishment Code, but rather referred to the sentencing guidelines not applicable to appellant’s offense. Athough the trial court in entering the sentence told the defendant he could receive the statutory maximum, that occurred after the plea colloquy, when the court went on to sentence appellant.

The order denying the motion is reversed and the case is remanded for an evidentiary hearing or attachment of additional record excerpts that show that appellant is not entitled to any relief on that issue.

POLEN, C.J., and WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 792 So. 2d 632, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11926, 2001 WL 946201 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

792 So. 2d 632 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
132 So. 3d 882 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Stacy v. State
885 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)