Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Robinson v. State

Robinson v. State

780 So. 2d 983, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3487, 2001 WL 273897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 736 So. 2d 93 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 21, 2001·No. No. 4D01-76·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing, if appropriate, either: (1) a Rule 3.800(a) motion that alleges where in the record the information regarding jail time can be located and explains how the record demonstrates entitlement to the credit for jail time, see Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); or (2) a properly sworn and pled Rule 3.850 motion challenging the sentence based on the failure to award jail time credit. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850(c)(6).

WARNER, C.J., KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 780 So. 2d 983, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3487, 2001 WL 273897 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

780 So. 2d 983 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)