Robinson v. State

681 So. 2d 1202, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11407, 1996 WL 613423
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8852
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 1996·No. No. 96-390·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant raises several issues on appeal. We find merit only in his contention that certain conditions of probation — namely, a, h, 1 and t — were not orally pronounced at sentencing; nor did the court include some $15.00 in fees and costs. In respect to the foregoing items, we order them stricken; otherwise, we affirm the lower court.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 681 So. 2d 1202, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11407, 1996 WL 613423 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

681 So. 2d 1202 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.