Robinson v. State

679 So. 2d 315, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8791, 1996 WL 468790
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8852
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 1996·No. No. 95-2163·Published

Opinion

ALLEN, Judge.

The appellant challenges judgments of convictions and sentences imposed for several offenses involving a firearm. Because all of the offenses were committed with the same firearm during a single criminal episode, State v. Stearns, 645 So.2d 417 (Fla.1994), precludes the conviction for carrying a concealed firearm. However, the various other offenses encompass conduct which would be criminal without regard to the existence of a firearm, and Allen v. State, 671 So.2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. granted, No. 87,941 (Fla.1996), establishes that the Steams prohibition against convicting and sentencing for multiple crimes involving a firearm and arising out of the same criminal episode thus does not apply to these offenses. Accordingly, the appellant’s conviction for carrying a concealed firearm is reversed and the sentence pertaining thereto is vacated, but the challenged orders are otherwise affirmed.

WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 679 So. 2d 315, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8791, 1996 WL 468790 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

679 So. 2d 315 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Stearns
645 So. 2d 417 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Allen v. State
671 So. 2d 233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)