Robinson v. State
256 So. 2d 240, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7439
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 So. 2d 282 →
Opinion
On this appeal by the defendant below following his conviction for robbery, the appellant’s contentions that the trial court [241]*241erred in denying his motion to suppress certain evidence (a gun) on the claim that it was the product of an unlawful search, and in denying his motion for continuance made during the trial, have been considered in the light of the record and briefs, and are held to be without merit. No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 256 So. 2d 240, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7439 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
256 So. 2d 240 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.