Robinson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Robinson v. State

189 So. 824, 138 Fla. 585, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1454

DecidedJune 13, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 824 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. State, 189 So. 824, 138 Fla. 585, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1454 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam. —

Writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of the larceny of a heifer.

The plaintiff in error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment.

The entire record has been examined. The evidence is found sufficient to support the judgment and verdict and no reversible error is made to appear.

Therefore, the judgment should be, and is, affirmed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.’ Chapman, J., dis'sents. Justice Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI