Robinson v. State
5 Ark. 659
Opinion
By the court,
The judgment in this case must be affirmed. There is no exception taken to the refusal to grant a new trial, and of course it cannot be noticed. The motion to arrest the judgment was properly overruled. The indictment charges the offence with accuracy and precision. It alleges that the defendant feloniously, wilfully, and of his malice aforethought, made an assault with intent to kill one Emily Bishop. This charge is every way sufficient, and pursues the statute and substantially complies with its requisites. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 5 Ark. 659 (Ark. 1844).
5 Ark. 659 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.