Robinson v. State
106 So. 204, 21 Ala. App. 169, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 291
Opinion
The mere fact that the cause had not been placed on the docket of the circuit court for two terms of court after indictment did not amount to a discontinuance. Roszell v. State, 19 Ala. App. 462, 98 So. 35.
The other questions raised in this record have been decided adversely to defendant in the ease of Robinson v. State, ante, p. 168, 106 So. 203.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 106 So. 204, 21 Ala. App. 169, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 291 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).
106 So. 204 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bowles v. State
147 So. 203 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1933)