Robinson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Robinson v. State

477 So. 2d 981, 1985 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5737

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedOctober 8, 1985

Docket3 Div. 243

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 477 So. 2d 981 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. State, 477 So. 2d 981, 1985 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5737 (Ala. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

TAYLOR, Judge.

The Attorney General, by letter, declines to file a brief and concedes error in this case as to failure to file a “statement of the evidence relied on.” He requests that the case be remanded on the basis of Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975). We find additional noncompliance of Armstrong in the matter of informing the probationer of the charges against him and in the giving of reasonable notice of such charges.

This cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the six due process requirements of Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973), as listed in Armstrong, supra.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI