Robinson v. State
This text of 934 So. 2d 1058 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. See Ex parte Bonner, 926 So.2d 339 (Ala.2005) (holding that where the petitioner alleges that he failed to receive notice of the dismissal of his Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition in time to effect a timely appeal therefrom, and the events about which the petitioner complains all occurred before June 1, 2005, the effective date of the amendment to Rule 32 providing a different remedy for obtaining an out-of-time appeal from the dismissal of a Rule 32 petition, a petition for a writ of mandamus is the only appropriate remedy); see also Ex parte V.S., 918 So.2d 908 (Ala.2005).
WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
934 So. 2d 1058, 2006 Ala. LEXIS 12, 2006 WL 147515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-ala-2006.