Robinson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Robinson v. State

934 So. 2d 1058, 2006 Ala. LEXIS 12, 2006 WL 147515

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 20, 2006·No. 1041381·Published

Opinion

SMITH, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. See Ex parte Bonner, 926 So.2d 339 (Ala.2005) (holding that where the petitioner alleges that he failed to receive notice of the dismissal of his Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition in time to effect a timely appeal therefrom, and the events about which the petitioner complains all occurred before June 1, 2005, the effective date of the amendment to Rule 32 providing a different remedy for obtaining an out-of-time appeal from the dismissal of a Rule 32 petition, a petition for a writ of mandamus is the only appropriate remedy); see also Ex parte V.S., 918 So.2d 908 (Ala.2005).

WRIT DENIED.

NABERS, C.J., and LYONS, WOODALL, and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMITH, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. See Ex parte Bonner, 926 So.2d 339 (Ala.2005) (holding that where the petitioner alleges that he failed to receive notice of the dismissal of his Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition in time to effect a timely appeal therefrom, and the events about which the petitioner complains all occurred before June 1, 2005, the effective date of the amendment to Rule 32 providing a different remedy for obtaining an out-of-time appeal from the dismissal of a Rule 32 petition, a petition for a writ of mandamus is the only appropriate remedy); see also Ex parte V.S., 918 So.2d 908 (Ala.2005).

WRIT DENIED.

NABERS, C.J., and LYONS, WOODALL, and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Robinson v. State, 934 So. 2d 1058, 2006 Ala. LEXIS 12, 2006 WL 147515 (Ala. 2006).

Pincite

934 So. 2d 1058 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related