Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund

587 P.2d 521, 37 Or. App. 671, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2286
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 18, 1978
DocketNo. WCB 77-2230, CA 11688
StatusPublished

This text of 587 P.2d 521 (Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund, 587 P.2d 521, 37 Or. App. 671, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2286 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this denial of workers’ compensation benefits case, the sole issue is credibility of the claimant. A recitation of the facts would not be helpful. See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103, 585 P2d 1149 (1978). The referee found her believable. The Workers’ Compensation Board disagreed. In de novo review, we find the issue a close one and, inasmuch as the referee had the opportunity to see and hear the claimant, we accept his evaluation. See, e.g., Miller v. Granite Const. Co., 28 Or App 473, 559 P2d 944 (1977).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Granite Construction Co.
559 P.2d 944 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
587 P.2d 521, 37 Or. App. 671, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-accident-insurance-fund-orctapp-1978.