Robinson v. Starley

29 Ind. 298
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 Ind. 298 (Robinson v. Starley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Starley, 29 Ind. 298 (Ind. 1868).

Opinion

Frazer, J.

Everything done by the court below was in strict accordance with the express consent of the appellant, who waived process, entered his appearance in person, and, by agreement, allowed judgment on a note and mortgage, for $1,593, to be entered against him, with a stay of execution for six months without bail. This was in October, 1866. The case is now submitted without any argument for the appellant.

If the judgment may be deemed to have been taken by confession, then, by express statute, it operates as a release of errors. If not a judgment by confession, then the agreement must be deemed a waiver of the' right to plead, and an admission of the truth of the averments of [299]*299the complaint. 2 G~. & H., § 74, p. 100. This appeal calls for heavy damages*

J. W. Lobinsón, for appellant. N. L. Linsday. and J. A. Lewis, for appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with six per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson v. Allison
54 Ind. 215 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Ind. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-starley-ind-1868.