Robinson v. St. Louis Coffin Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Robinson v. St. Louis Coffin Co.

90 S.E. 94, 18 Ga. App. 569, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1114

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 21, 1916

Docket7313

StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.E. 94 (Robinson v. St. Louis Coffin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. St. Louis Coffin Co., 90 S.E. 94, 18 Ga. App. 569, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1114 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. In the light of the untraversed answer of the trial judge to the petition for certiorari, it does not appear that the judge of the superior court erred in overruling the petition.

2. The question as to the power of a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta to direct a verdict was not raised in this ease in either the trial court or the superior court, and, consequently, will not be considered by this court. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

1. In the light of the untraversed answer of the trial judge to the petition for certiorari, it does not appear that the judge of the superior court erred in overruling the petition.

2. The question as to the power of a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta to direct a verdict was not raised in this ease in either the trial court or the superior court, and, consequently, will not be considered by this court. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 S.E. 94, 18 Ga. App. 569, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-st-louis-coffin-co-gactapp-1916.