Robinson v. Smith

14 Cal. 254
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1859
DocketNo. 2
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 Cal. 254 (Robinson v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Smith, 14 Cal. 254 (Cal. 1859).

Opinion

Baldwin, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court—Cope, J. and Field, C. J. concurring.

In this case the Court allowed the defendant, Smith, Appellant, to file a several plea of the statute of limitations, he having before filed a joint plea with the other defendant, Barber, which was held not to be good in favor of Barber. The amendment was made on the trial, and after this plea was held bad as to Barber. This appeal questions the propriety of this action of the Court. But we think we cannot revise this ruling of the District Court. Amendments are very much matters of discretion, and unless a gross abuse of that discretion be shown, we cannot revise the action of the Judge who tries the cause. We see no such abuse in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kraft v. Greathouse
1 Idaho 254 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1869)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Cal. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-smith-cal-1859.