Robinson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided October 5, 2022·No. 20-1718·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Guited States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-1718V UNPUBLISHED JOHN ROBINSON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 23, 2022 V. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Influenza HUMAN SERVICES, (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. (SIRVA)

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.

Terrence Kevin Mangan, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION"

On December 1, 2020, John Robinson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, ef seg.? (the “Vaccine Act’). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) resulting from the administration of an influenza (flu) vaccination received on September 22, 2018. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at August 23, 2022, 9 1-2. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccination was administered within the United States, he suffered the residual effects of his injury for more than six months, and no lawsuits have been filed or settlement or awards accepted by anyone due to his vaccine- related injury. Petition at 7; Stipulation at ({ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused [Petitioner to suffer a left shoulder injury or any other injury and denies that [P]etitioner sustained a SIRVA Table Injury.” Stipulation at J 6.

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, | am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, | agree that the identified material fits within this definition, | will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on August 23, 2022, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. | find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, | award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¢ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). /d.

| approve the requested amount for Petitioner's compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.*®

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

JOHN ROBINSON, Petitioner, No. 20-1718V Chief Special Master Corcoran

v. ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. John Robinson, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries alleged ly related to petitioner’s receipt of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which is a vaccine contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received flu vaccine on September 22, 2018.

3, The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he sustained a left shoulder injury related to vaccination administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of the flu vaccine, within the Table time period, and suffered the residual effects of this alleged injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement ofa civil action

for damages on his behalfas a result of his condition. 6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer a left shoulder injury or any other injury and denies that petitioner sustained a SIRWA Table Injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with ‘the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $80,000.00 in the form ofa check payable to petitioner. This

amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9, As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the Chief Special Master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis. 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2022).

Robinson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Robinson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a