Robinson v. Sanders

Supreme Court of Alabama

Robinson v. Sanders

530 So. 2d 821, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 375, 1988 WL 92365

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJuly 29, 1988

Docket87-684

StatusPublished

This text of 530 So. 2d 821 (Robinson v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Sanders, 530 So. 2d 821, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 375, 1988 WL 92365 (Ala. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant’s “issue presented” and “argument” on appeal are limited to her amended counterclaim for the imposition of a constructive trust, the summary judgment in favor of the appellee, based on the 10-year statute of limitations applicable to this remedy for recovery of land, is affirmed on the authority of Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-33; and Haavik v. Famell, 264 Ala. 326, 87 So.2d 629 (1956).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant’s “issue presented” and “argument” on appeal are limited to her amended counterclaim for the imposition of a constructive trust, the summary judgment in favor of the appellee, based on the 10-year statute of limitations applicable to this remedy for recovery of land, is affirmed on the authority of Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-33; and Haavik v. Famell, 264 Ala. 326, 87 So.2d 629 (1956).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

530 So. 2d 821, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 375, 1988 WL 92365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-sanders-ala-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack