Robinson v. Sanders

Supreme Court of Alabama

Robinson v. Sanders

530 So. 2d 821, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 375, 1988 WL 92365

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 29, 1988·No. 87-684·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant’s “issue presented” and “argument” on appeal are limited to her amended counterclaim for the imposition of a constructive trust, the summary judgment in favor of the appellee, based on the 10-year statute of limitations applicable to this remedy for recovery of land, is affirmed on the authority of Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-33; and Haavik v. Famell, 264 Ala. 326, 87 So.2d 629 (1956).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant’s “issue presented” and “argument” on appeal are limited to her amended counterclaim for the imposition of a constructive trust, the summary judgment in favor of the appellee, based on the 10-year statute of limitations applicable to this remedy for recovery of land, is affirmed on the authority of Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-33; and Haavik v. Famell, 264 Ala. 326, 87 So.2d 629 (1956).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Robinson v. Sanders, 530 So. 2d 821, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 375, 1988 WL 92365 (Ala. 1988).

Pincite

530 So. 2d 821 (Robinson v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related