Robinson v. Salter Bus Lines, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Robinson v. Salter Bus Lines, Inc.

322 So. 2d 799, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 4342

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 31, 1975

DocketNo. 5145

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 322 So. 2d 799 (Robinson v. Salter Bus Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Salter Bus Lines, Inc., 322 So. 2d 799, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 4342 (La. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinions

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a companion case to Salter Bus Lines, Inc. v. William A. Leitch et al., La. App., 322 So.2d 793 in which a separate judgment is being rendered by us this date. The plaintiffs in the present case are Martha N. Robinson and Beverly Robinson, individually and as natural tutrix of her minor son, Demetric Madison. They were passengers in the bus. They sued the bus company and its insurer, who in turn filed a third party demand against Leitch and his insurer. Prior to trial, the Robinsons settled their claim against the bus company to whom they subrogated their respective claims. Judgment was rendered in the present case rejecting the demands of the plaintiffs.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Salter Bus Lines, Inc. v. Willard A. Leitch et al., the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the appellants.

Affirmed.

MILLER, J., dissents and assigns written reasons.

HOOD, J., dissents for the reasons assigned by MILLER, J. and both voted for a rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a companion case to Salter Bus Lines, Inc. v. William A. Leitch et al., La. App., 322 So.2d 793 in which a separate judgment is being rendered by us this date. The plaintiffs in the present case are Martha N. Robinson and Beverly Robinson, individually and as natural tutrix of her minor son, Demetric Madison. They were passengers in the bus. They sued the bus company and its insurer, who in turn filed a third party demand against Leitch and his insurer. Prior to trial, the Robinsons settled their claim against the bus company to whom they subrogated their respective claims. Judgment was rendered in the present case rejecting the demands of the plaintiffs.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Salter Bus Lines, Inc. v. Willard A. Leitch et al., the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the appellants.

Affirmed.

MILLER, J., dissents and assigns written reasons.

HOOD, J., dissents for the reasons assigned by MILLER, J. and both voted for a rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 So. 2d 799, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 4342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-salter-bus-lines-inc-lactapp-1975.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack