Robinson v. Runion

Fourth Circuit

Robinson v. Runion

456 F. App'x 274

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 30, 2011·No. No. 11-7233·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jackie Lewis Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Robinson’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Runion, No. 1:11-cv-00542-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 29, [275]*2752011; entered Sept. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jackie Lewis Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Robinson’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Runion, No. 1:11-cv-00542-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 29, [275]*2752011; entered Sept. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Robinson v. Runion, 456 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

456 F. App'x 274 (Robinson v. Runion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related