Robinson v. Rosenblum, Jasper, Harris & Reichard Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Rosenblum, Jasper, Harris & Reichard Co.

253 A.D. 846, 2 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8879

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 846 (Robinson v. Rosenblum, Jasper, Harris & Reichard Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Rosenblum, Jasper, Harris & Reichard Co., 253 A.D. 846, 2 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting plaintiffs’ motion for examination of the defendants before trial, in an action for breach of contract, modified by striking therefrom items Nos. 2, 6, 11, 13 and 14, and as thus modified affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. The items eliminated were improperly allowed. The others are retained although improper in form to avoid further applications to the court. Despite the inepitude displayed in the complaint, it contains a cause of action for damages for breach of contract. The examination may proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell., Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting plaintiffs’ motion for examination of the defendants before trial, in an action for breach of contract, modified by striking therefrom items Nos. 2, 6, 11, 13 and 14, and as thus modified affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. The items eliminated were improperly allowed. The others are retained although improper in form to avoid further applications to the court. Despite the inepitude displayed in the complaint, it contains a cause of action for damages for breach of contract. The examination may proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell., Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 846, 2 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-rosenblum-jasper-harris-reichard-co-nyappdiv-1938.