Robinson v. Robinson
1 Barb. 27
Opinion
after having examined the papers, granted the application. His honor said that, in order to guard against [28] collusion, and sham services of the papers in cases of this nature, he should hereafter, whenever a bill for divorce should be taken as confessed, refuse to grant a decree until after an inspection of the bill, proofs, and the affidavit of service of the subpoena upon the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. Robinson, 1 Barb. 27 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).
1 Barb. 27 (Robinson v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wallace Forman v. United States
329 F.3d 837 (Federal Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Clay William Long
42 F.3d 1389 (Sixth Circuit, 1994)
National Labor Relations Board v. Greenleaf Motor Express, Inc., and Ashtabula Chemical Corp.
872 F.2d 1027 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
Maduro v. Maduro
145 P.2d 683 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
Underwood v. Underwood
12 Fla. 434 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1868)